From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gregor Zattler <telegraph@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Bug: 3 bugs and 2 proposals on ascii/html export [7.8.03]
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:02:47 +0100
Message-ID: <20120309160246.GB8370@joerg.workgroup>
References: <20120309005334.GA19970@gmx.org> <87r4x2jzit.fsf@gnu.org>
	<80pqcm13ry.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<CA+SyOP9730B+p+qKE9gAzxNOR=Vb9Kjig+XDpWHxF-55AVnU1w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60037)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1S62I3-00026N-M6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:03:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1S62Hx-0002P7-5v
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:03:35 -0500
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:43190)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <error4me@gmx.de>) id 1S62Hw-0002Or-RY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:03:29 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+SyOP9730B+p+qKE9gAzxNOR=Vb9Kjig+XDpWHxF-55AVnU1w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Gustav,
* Gustav Wikström <gustav.erik@gmail.com> [09. Mar. 2012]:
>> For me, it makes a lot of sense to invert both, as Mathias is suggesting
>> it.
>>
> +1
+1
 
> It would conform more to a sort of "standard" that way, (see
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweight_markup_language#Section_headers)

We did it this way on mechanical typewriters.

Fred Flintstone