From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Viktor Rosenfeld <listuser36@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Drawers within inline tasks
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 03:02:15 +0100
Message-ID: <20120129020215.GA70247@kenny.fritz.box>
References: <20120127224653.GA1365@kenny.fritz.box> <87bopnzwpc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20120128160247.GA64669@kenny.fritz.box>
	<87pqe3wgy8.fsf@altern.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41046)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <listuser36@googlemail.com>) id 1RrK62-0003XJ-Je
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:02:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <listuser36@googlemail.com>) id 1RrK61-0008Ao-Jb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:02:22 -0500
Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:63993)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <listuser36@googlemail.com>) id 1RrK61-0008AZ-Bb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:02:21 -0500
Received: by bkbzs2 with SMTP id zs2so1681687bkb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:02:19 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87pqe3wgy8.fsf@altern.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Bastien,

Bastien wrote:

> Fixed, thanks.
> 
> I first didn't take care of this because it seemed logical to 
> show all the content of an inline task here: the purpose of the
> inline task is to stay out of the hierarchical structure, such
> a task is *not* a subtree...  so the real content of "Parent task"
> is all the text below -- whether it contains inline tasks or not.

I was initially irritated by this behaviour because I kept some plain
lists inside inline tasks, but now I can see the advantages of having
them always stand out. And I can always put stuff in a drawer now.

> Thanks for reporting this,

Thank you for your work!

Cheers,
Viktor