From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Frankel Subject: Re: org-babel order of evaluation Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:52:44 -0500 Message-ID: <20120113015244.GA27002@BigDog.local> References: <20120112002506.GA26183@BigDog.local> <87y5td7z2t.fsf@gmx.com> <20120112225129.GA26670@BigDog.local> <87ipkgqu8w.fsf@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RlWK1-00035G-72 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:52:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RlWK0-0002kH-Ad for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:52:49 -0500 Received: from [204.62.15.78] (port=58175 helo=mail.rickster.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RlWK0-0002k6-8n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:52:48 -0500 Received: from BigDog.local (pool-173-68-170-125.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [173.68.170.125]) by mail.rickster.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6B7D22299 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:52:46 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ipkgqu8w.fsf@gmx.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:07:41PM -0700, Eric Schulte wrote: > Rick Frankel writes: > > Turns out it was not that difficult to change this behavior. You and > Leo are both correct that in-buffer-order evaluation is more natural and > expected than the previous behavior. I've just pushed up a fix after > which evaluating the following > Brillant! thank you Eric. This saves me much pain. rick