From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Frankel <rick@rickster.com>
Subject: org-babel order of evaluation
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:25:06 -0500
Message-ID: <20120112002506.GA26183@BigDog.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55997)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1Rl8kn-00056e-6q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:42:54 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1Rl8km-00004z-8O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:42:53 -0500
Received: from [204.62.15.78] (port=48205 helo=mail.rickster.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rick@rickster.com>) id 1Rl8km-0008WT-22
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:42:52 -0500
Received: from BigDog.local (pool-173-68-170-125.nycmny.fios.verizon.net
	[173.68.170.125])
	by mail.rickster.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4593221AC
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:25:06 -0500 (EST)
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

There is a problem with the order of execution of interspersed source
and call blocks will not be executed in order because of the way
org-babel-execute-buffer is written (first all the source blocks, then
all the call blocks). 

Therefore, when executing an entire buffer, there is no way to have
the execution of a call block dependent on the prior execution of a
source block.

Given the following:

	#+name: one(v="one")
	#+begin_src elisp
	v
	#+end_src

	#+call: one("two")

	#+name: three(v="three")
	#+begin_src elisp
	v
	#+end_src

The message buffer shows:

	executing Elisp code block (one)...

	(v (quote "one"))

	Code block evaluation complete.
	executing Elisp code block (three)...

	(v (quote "three"))

	Code block evaluation complete.
	executing Elisp code block (one)...

	(v (quote "two"))

	"two"
	executing Emacs-Lisp code block...

	(results (quote "two"))