From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Bausch <DanielBausch@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:58:58 +0200
Message-ID: <201110260758.58485.DanielBausch@gmx.de>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwih2f0h.fsf@gmail.com>
	<6288.1319563282@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47521)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <DanielBausch@gmx.de>) id 1RIwVx-0008U1-Kj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:59:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <DanielBausch@gmx.de>) id 1RIwVw-0006aD-7X
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:59:01 -0400
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:53894)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <DanielBausch@gmx.de>) id 1RIwVv-0006a8-Ph
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:59:00 -0400
In-Reply-To: <6288.1319563282@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com

Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2011, 19:21:22 schrieb Nick Dokos:
> Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Martyn Jago <martyn.jago@btinternet.com> writes:
> > > Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:
> > >> Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I
> > >>> haven't yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would
> > >>> have been the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for
> > >>> named code blocks as well as named data.  So I'll vote for #+name:
> > >>> here making it a tie, and I'll also take tie-breaking powers upon
> > >>> myself giving #+name: the win.
> > >> 
> > >> This is going to cost you, Schulte! It's not going to go down that
> > >> easily. I'll call the FTC, the FCC, the SCOTUS, the POTUS, the NYT,
> > >> the BDFL, the NFL and the MLB: an outrage I tell you! An affront to
> > >> the democratic rules some of us cherish! We'll fight to the death!
> > >> Who's with me?
> > 
> > Ha!
> > 
> > Well at least SCOTUS should be on my side, as they seem to have no
> > problem giving some people more freedom than others.
> 
> Indeed - but what about the NFL? I bet they have more integrity.
> 
> 
> On second thought...
> 
> > > +1 #+name
> 
> Back stabber!

Oops, I didn't want to split the community.  Be nice to each other.

> > Well thank goodness, even if I can't put my own thumb on the scale it
> > seems I can advertise enough to sway voters to my cause. :)
> 
> Bribery and Corruption - what is the world coming to?
> 
> > Cheers -- Eric
> > 
> > > mj