From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Bausch Subject: Re: Surprising behaviour with agenda file Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:25:14 +0200 Message-ID: <201109291525.15053.DanielBausch@gmx.de> References: <874nzvilx1.fsf@msstf091.ucc.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9GcA-0004fV-BF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:25:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9Gc4-00086N-CT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:25:26 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:55058) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9Gc3-00085w-S4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:25:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874nzvilx1.fsf@msstf091.ucc.ie> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org It's not a bug, it's a feature (although I don't know what it's for -- maybe speed). However, there is a customizable option to switch it off: org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry Daniel Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 14:16:10 schrieb Andreas Amann: > Hi list, > > I encounter the following surprising situation when using Org Agenda. > > Suppose you have an agenda file which looks like this: > ---- test.org ------ > * bar > <2011-09-29 Thu 12:00> > <2011-09-30 Fri 13:00> > > > * foo > <2011-09-29 Thu 15:00> > <2011-09-29 Thu 16:00> > -------------------- > > M-x org-agenda-week-view > then shows: > -------------------- > Week-agenda (W39): > Monday 26 September 2011 W39 > Tuesday 27 September 2011 > Wednesday 28 September 2011 > Thursday 29 September 2011 > 8:00...... ---------------- > 10:00...... ---------------- > test: 12:00...... bar > 12:00...... ---------------- > 13:09...... now - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > - - 14:00...... ---------------- > test: 15:00...... foo > 16:00...... ---------------- > 18:00...... ---------------- > 20:00...... ---------------- > Friday 30 September 2011 > test: 13:00...... bar > Saturday 1 October 2011 > Sunday 2 October 2011 > > ---------------------- > > What surprises me, is that "foo" only appears once (Thurs 15:00) > although I specified it twice in the agenda file. If the two entries in > question refer to two different days, like "bar" in the above example, > everything works as expected. > > Is this a bug? If it is considered a feature I would be interested to > know, how to work around it. > > Thanks, > Andreas