From: Daniel Bausch <DanielBausch@gmx.de>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Surprising behaviour with agenda file
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:25:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109291525.15053.DanielBausch@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874nzvilx1.fsf@msstf091.ucc.ie>
It's not a bug, it's a feature (although I don't know what it's for -- maybe
speed). However, there is a customizable option to switch it off:
org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry
Daniel
Am Donnerstag 29 September 2011, 14:16:10 schrieb Andreas Amann:
> Hi list,
>
> I encounter the following surprising situation when using Org Agenda.
>
> Suppose you have an agenda file which looks like this:
> ---- test.org ------
> * bar
> <2011-09-29 Thu 12:00>
> <2011-09-30 Fri 13:00>
>
>
> * foo
> <2011-09-29 Thu 15:00>
> <2011-09-29 Thu 16:00>
> --------------------
>
> M-x org-agenda-week-view
> then shows:
> --------------------
> Week-agenda (W39):
> Monday 26 September 2011 W39
> Tuesday 27 September 2011
> Wednesday 28 September 2011
> Thursday 29 September 2011
> 8:00...... ----------------
> 10:00...... ----------------
> test: 12:00...... bar
> 12:00...... ----------------
> 13:09...... now - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - 14:00...... ----------------
> test: 15:00...... foo
> 16:00...... ----------------
> 18:00...... ----------------
> 20:00...... ----------------
> Friday 30 September 2011
> test: 13:00...... bar
> Saturday 1 October 2011
> Sunday 2 October 2011
>
> ----------------------
>
> What surprises me, is that "foo" only appears once (Thurs 15:00)
> although I specified it twice in the agenda file. If the two entries in
> question refer to two different days, like "bar" in the above example,
> everything works as expected.
>
> Is this a bug? If it is considered a feature I would be interested to
> know, how to work around it.
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-29 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 12:16 Surprising behaviour with agenda file Andreas Amann
2011-09-29 13:25 ` Daniel Bausch [this message]
2011-09-29 13:43 ` Michael Brand
2011-09-29 15:48 ` Andreas Amann
2011-09-29 17:12 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-10-04 12:33 ` Carsten Dominik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201109291525.15053.DanielBausch@gmx.de \
--to=danielbausch@gmx.de \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).