From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viktor Rosenfeld Subject: Re: missing todo's in agenda after emacs/org upgrade Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:30:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20110819203021.GA2711@kenny.fritz.box> References: <06FD744B-8465-49C4-9A4A-45E2B4DCBF2B@agfa.com> <80y5yqpgin.fsf@somewhere.org> <3247E27F-C23D-4B93-9040-C64C8B7546F1@agfa.com> <3CFA5C89-CCDA-4D08-8974-2B3609BD7151@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QuVi2-0002jq-9X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:30:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QuVi1-0002Im-H8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:30:30 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:57597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QuVi1-0002HO-88 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:30:29 -0400 Received: by bkbzt4 with SMTP id zt4so2963666bkb.0 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CFA5C89-CCDA-4D08-8974-2B3609BD7151@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik wrote: > 2. Moving through time does not work in a block view when the cursor is in the TODO list. > > Maybe we can find ways to address these two issues? For example, including a built-in command > for this double view, or seeding org-agenda-custom-commands with this particular block? > > The 2. issue comes about because in a bock agenda, org only update the > local block to save time, and in a TODO list it does not make sense to > move through time. This could be fixed by checking for an agenda > block and updating that one instead. I will take a look at this and > make a proposal. This would be very nice indeed. Right now, one has to jump back to the beginning of the buffer, which is somewhat irritating. Cheers, Viktor