From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: SAKURAI Masashi <m.sakurai@kiwanami.net>
Subject: Re: New backend for org-agenda: (Was Calendar-like view	of	the
 org-agenda)
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:35:46 +0900
Message-ID: <20110723023546.D835613C51B@vps1.kiwanami.net>
References: <20110710154117.881A213C51B@vps1.kiwanami.net>
	<87fwmcar0u.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20110716162238.DC9D213C517@vps1.kiwanami.net>
	<87d3h7w5nd.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20110720075047.13A8013C4EB@vps1.kiwanami.net>
	<874o2grmdv.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51717)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <m.sakurai@kiwanami.net>) id 1QkS4G-0008Mu-6H
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:35:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <m.sakurai@kiwanami.net>) id 1QkS4E-0006S8-Ra
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:35:52 -0400
Received: from vps1.kiwanami.net ([182.48.41.71]:60383)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <m.sakurai@kiwanami.net>) id 1QkS4E-0006Rs-HH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:35:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <874o2grmdv.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: bzg@altern.org
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Bastien,

At Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:52:44 +0200,
Bastien wrote:
> :
> > I'm also think about cache in the calfw side, such as an alist:
> > (date . [a list of contents]). Then, uses can refresh the cache
> > explicitly. It is easy to implement.
> >
> > Is the plan(1) the same idea?
> 
> Yes, It's the same idea, but on Org's side.

I see. It sounds great.


> I'm focusing on bugfixes for the next release and cannot work 
> through the details of the implementation, but I keep thinking
> about it.

Ok. I also need a time to do other things.
Indeed, I have to write the document of calfw.

Regards,
--
SAKURAI, Masashi (family, given)
m.sakurai@kiwanami.net