From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcel van der Boom <marcel@hsdev.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Continuation of main section text after subsections ?
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:54:16 +0200
Message-ID: <20110328165416.1b8357bb@hsdev.com>
References: <20110327170251.58923564@hsdev.com> <81tyeotvzo.fsf@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimA5fR-gfCFSKPHhfJb8321vYjUOb+CuCChCztW@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110327181155.054fecf2@hsdev.com>
	<87vcz4ebu9.fsf@lw-wireless-pittnet-40-144.wireless.pitt.edu>
	<AANLkTikiGw2TwEff+t9UvTNN=UVciRDktvLw5w3S-zFm@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55421 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4Dpi-0005CQ-Eh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:54:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marcel@hsdev.com>) id 1Q4Dpg-0002Es-W8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:54:17 -0400
Received: from router2.hsdev.com ([213.125.12.138]:36255 helo=mrb.hsdev.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marcel@hsdev.com>) id 1Q4Dpg-0002Eo-Pw
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:54:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikiGw2TwEff+t9UvTNN=UVciRDktvLw5w3S-zFm@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Filippo A. Salustri" <salustri@ryerson.ca>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On zo 27-mrt-2011 13:08
"Filippo A. Salustri" <salustri@ryerson.ca> wrote:

> I would humbly suggest that the real question is a design / use case
> question.  Is it reasonable to expect authors to stick to proper
> outline format throughout their drafting process?  If it is, then org
> is fine as is.  If it isn't, then there's a problem.

Very much agreed. I think that paragraph is the best summary so
far for the problem, stated in generic terms. 

marcel

PS
For what it is worth, I think the 'case of inline tasks' is exactly the
same problem as mine.

-- 
Marcel van der Boom  -- http://hsdev.com/mvdb.vcf
HS-Development BV    -- http://www.hsdev.com
So! web applications -- http://make-it-so.info
Cobra build          -- http://cobra.mrblog.nl