From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Accepted] Allow mixed export of numbered and unnumbered
 sections in HTML
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:50:17 -0700
Message-ID: <20110323085017.5ed30331@kuru.homelinux.net>
References: <m34o6u2mwf.fsf_-_@e4300lm.epcc.ed.ac.uk>
	<20110323140504.98CE6715E@myhost.localdomain>
	<7791.1300892223@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38619 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2QRt-00069F-8f
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:58:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1Q2QRr-0003ph-SE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:58:17 -0400
Received: from mail-yw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.213.41]:41026)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>) id 1Q2QRr-0003pL-Px
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:58:15 -0400
Received: by yws5 with SMTP id 5so4403743yws.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7791.1300892223@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Cc: Bastien Guerry <bzg@altern.org>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:57:03 -0400
Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> wrote:

> IMO, it would be better to accumulate the patches and once all of the
> exporters (or perhaps a critical mass: ascii, odt, docbook are the
> ones I would like to see get patches, but opinions will vary) have
> patches, then apply the whole thing in one commit (together with a
> documentation patch). In the meantime, if anybody needs one of them
> (hi, Suvayu :-)), they could carry it in their local branch.

Yes, I understand and agree to your argument. I am already using the
patch on my local branch. :)

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.