From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suvayu Ali Subject: Re: Re: unnumbered subsections in latex export Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:31:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20110322053134.669127e9@kuru.homelinux.net> References: <20110322051038.21655c80@kuru.homelinux.net> <80d3lj9wj6.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46835 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q20kR-00063y-7J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:31:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q20kP-0003Nb-QY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:31:43 -0400 Received: from mail-yi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:42077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q20kP-0003NS-NZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:31:41 -0400 Received: by yib2 with SMTP id 2so3598291yib.0 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:31:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <80d3lj9wj6.fsf@somewhere.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi S=C3=A9bastien, On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:20:29 +0100 S=C3=A9bastien Vauban wrote: > > > > I was wondering whether there is some way to export the attached org > > file to latex such that headlines beyond level 2 (3 and onwards) can > > be exported as unnumbered subsections or subsubsections like this, > > \subsection*{}, instead of enclosing them within itemize. > > > > The file uses the following options header: > > > > #+OPTIONS: H:2 num:t toc:t ::t |:t ^:t -:t f:t *:t <:nil >=20 > Using H:3 num:2? Untested... But that should do the work. >=20 That didn't work. It exports the same as the following options #+OPTIONS: H:3 num:t toc:t ::t |:t ^:t -:t f:t *:t <:nil I think the num option is a boolean. The manual says the following: num: turn on/off section-numbers Would it be a worthwhile feature request to allow numbers for that option? Then one could have finer control on the numbering. > Best regards, > Seb >=20 Thanks, --=20 Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.