From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: [Accepted] Re: In-buffer completion Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:12:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20101123141213.8F726762995@carsten-dominiks-macbook-pro.local> References: <874obblwa8.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36428 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKwzK-0005wc-PR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:49:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKwyK-0006K4-IK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:49:03 -0500 Received: from mail16.bluewin.ch ([195.186.19.63]:13652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKwyK-0006JX-7z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:48:04 -0500 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Patch 396 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/396/) is now "Accepted". Maintainer comment: No comment This relates to the following submission: http://mid.gmane.org/%3C874obblwa8.fsf%40gmail.com%3E Here is the original message containing the patch: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Subject: [Orgmode] Re: In-buffer completion > Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 22:50:07 -0000 > From: Dan Davison > X-Patchwork-Id: 396 > Message-Id: <874obblwa8.fsf@gmail.com> > To: Carsten Dominik > Cc: John Wiegley , Org Mode > > Carsten Dominik writes: > > > Dear all, > > > > yesterday I replaced the previous implementation of > > in-buffer completion (M-TAB of Esc TAB) with a new > > function making use of John Wiegleys pcomplete.el. > > In fact, John did most of the Org-related implementation > > already months ago - I only tied up some loose ends. > > > > So if you are noticing something unexpected in > > in-buffer completion, this is the cause. There may > > be bugs, if you find any, let me know. > > > > Most importantly, however, in-buffer completion is now > > implement so much cleaner, and we can extend it if we > > want. So if you have good ideas where in-buffer completion > > would be useful and does not work already, lets hear it! > > Hi Carsten, > > That looks nice. Here's a few #+ keywords I notice are > missing. (Shouldn't more of these entries have a terminal colon?) > > Dan > > > > > > > Thanks to John for yet another great addition to Org mode. > > > > - Carsten > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > > diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el > index c634a6c..917a368 100644 > --- a/lisp/org.el > +++ b/lisp/org.el > @@ -10547,9 +10547,14 @@ This function can be used in a hook." > "BEGIN_VERSE" "END_VERSE" > "BEGIN_CENTER" "END_CENTER" > "BEGIN_SRC" "END_SRC" > + "SOURCE:" "SRCNAME:" "FUNCTION:" > + "RESULTS:" > + "HEADER:" "HEADERS:" > + "BABEL:" > "CATEGORY" "COLUMNS" "PROPERTY" > "CAPTION" "LABEL" > "SETUPFILE" > + "INCLUDE:" > "BIND" > "MACRO")) > >