From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastien Delafond Subject: Re: Emphasis spanning more than two lines doesn't get font-lock'ed Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <20100216140711.59@usenet.piggo.com> References: <20100216130649.608@usenet.piggo.com> <87ljets566.wl%maus.david@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NhNAi-000720-4i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:09:00 -0500 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50918 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NhNAg-00071m-S4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:08:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhNAg-00086w-C9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:08:58 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:39315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhNAg-00086j-52 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:08:58 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NhNAe-000364-0H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:08:56 +0100 Received: from 64.2.3.200 ([64.2.3.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:08:55 +0100 Received: from sdelafond by 64.2.3.200 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:08:55 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2010-02-16, David Maus wrote: > I would say: No. It's not a bug, just a limitation of the > highlighting capability. Dunno if you follow the list, the question > on highlighting multiple lines was recently asked and answered: > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/22351 sorry for the noise, I should have followed more carefully. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. Cheers, --Seb