From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gabi Danon Subject: Re: Re: Results of the SourceForge Community Award Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:03:54 +0300 Message-ID: <20090724210354.52cfb65e@bigus> References: <87prbqmjro.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MUP7l-0002vh-O8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:04:05 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MUP7h-0002lp-RM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:04:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49472 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MUP7h-0002lE-JS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:04:01 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f217.google.com ([209.85.218.217]:55557) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MUP7g-0003mb-Tb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:04:01 -0400 Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so558156bwz.42 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:03:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Until about a month ago, I was a non-emacs user; and indeed, I thought it's bad looking and, in some respects, primitive. The reason I started using it anyway is org-mode: I wanted a decent outliner, and none of the others I tried fit my way of working. So I gave it a try despite the way it looks. Now I use emacs+org-mode for outlining, planning, taking notes, drafting papers, and almost anything else that has to do with text. As far as I'm concerned, org-mode is no longer just 'likely to change' the way I do everything. Gabi User wrote: > No wonder it didn't win. Non-emacs users have few incentive to > try it, since they think emacs is bad looking and primitve in > general, so they are looking for something more flashy instead > and do not even try it.