From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Burtzlaff Subject: Re: Spreadsheet bug? Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:04:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20090723110453.17994c2f.andy13@gmx.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuEL-0004yO-Qk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:04:49 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuEH-0004ut-3O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:04:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50549 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTuEG-0004uX-Os for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:04:44 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:51353) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTuEG-0002Sd-1J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:04:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: meingbg Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:29:30 +0200 meingbg wrote: > | a | b | c | > |---+----+---| > | a | 2 | 2 | > | b | 3 | 7 | > | c | -3 | 4 | > | d | 5 | 9 | > #+TBLFM: $3=$2+@-1::@2$3=$2 A good solution is to use $3=vsum(@-I$-1..$-1) as proposed in this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/1940/focus=1941 Nevertheless: If @2$3 is manually set to 2 in the table, then the formulas produce the expected outcome. So, the problem seems to be the order of execution. If column c is cleared and the formulas are executed, @2$3 is read to be 0 for the summation and is set to 2 only afterwards. Swapping the order in the TBLFM line doesn't help. Is the order something like field formulas after column formulas? Any chance to influence that? Andy