From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hsiu-Khuern Tang <hsiu-khuern.tang@hp.com>
Subject: Re: cannot edit two source code examples simultaneously
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:32:17 -0700
Message-ID: <20090519003216.GL13183@hplhtang1>
References: <20090515053802.GE13183@hplhtang1>
	<4FBDF50D-609C-4816-952C-54A83854F528@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Hsiu-Khuern Tang <hsiu-khuern.tang@hp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M6DHX-0000n3-AB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 20:34:11 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1M6DHS-0000mD-HQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 20:34:10 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49890 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M6DHS-0000mA-9e
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 20:34:06 -0400
Received: from madara.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.124]:61456)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <htang@hplhtang1.hpl.hp.com>) id 1M6DHR-0008CH-IQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 20:34:06 -0400
Received: from mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com (mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com [15.25.115.25])
	by madara.hpl.hp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id
	n4J0WPap026282
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 17:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hplhtang1.hpl.hp.com (hplhtang1.hpl.hp.com [15.4.92.205])
	by mailhub-pa1.hpl.hp.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/HPL-PA Hub) with ESMTP id
	n4J0WP7s007280
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 18 May 2009 17:32:25 -0700
Received: from htang by hplhtang1.hpl.hp.com with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <htang@hplhtang1>) id 1M6DFh-0006Wx-P9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 17:32:17 -0700
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FBDF50D-609C-4816-952C-54A83854F528@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

* On Sat 05:39PM +0000, 16 May 2009, Carsten Dominik (carsten.dominik@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Hsiu-Khuern,
> 
> On May 15, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang wrote:
> 
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> You recently changed org-edit-src-code to use a separate buffer instead of an
> indirect buffer.  One side effect of this is that I can no longer edit several
> code examples at the same time: opening the second buffer will silently discard
> any changes made in the first.  I would prefer this behavior: when opening the
> second edit source buffer, write any changes in the first buffer to the
> originating Org buffer (but don't save it, of course).
> 
> Another approach is to use different buffer names.
> 
> I think the second idea is better, provided that a mechanism
> ensures that not two editing instances of the same region
> are created.  This is what I have implemented now.  Thank
> you for your report.

Thanks for implementing this and the subsequent refinements based on Dan's and
Taru's inputs!

-- 
Best,
Hsiu-Khuern.