From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cameron Horsburgh Subject: Re: Adding time to deadline and schedule timestamps Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 22:42:30 +1000 Message-ID: <20090407124230.GA4015@earth> References: <421502.81336.qm@web28312.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LrAdh-0001rZ-Py for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:42:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LrAdc-0001ox-VF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:42:53 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37321 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LrAdc-0001ot-QP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:42:48 -0400 Received: from poplet2.per.eftel.com ([203.24.100.45]:42783) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LrAdb-0003PB-Rv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:42:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <421502.81336.qm@web28312.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Giovanni Ridolfi Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:24:33PM +0000, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: > > --- Mar 7/4/09, Cameron Horsburgh ha scritto: > > I'm trying to get a little more control over my > > DEADLINE and SCHEDULED > > timestamps. > > The manual (8.3 Deadlines and scheduling) states: > > [...] special keywords to facilitate *planning* > > DEADLINE > Meaning: the task (most likely a TODO item, though not > necessarily) is supposed to be finished on that *date*. > > SCHEDULED > Meaning: you are planning to start working on that task on the > given *date*. > > > I think you should use a timestamp > > * Submit :Project_A_ > DEADLINE <2008-10-11> > ** last minute for submission > <2008-10-11 16:59> > Yes, that's true. However, being able to do this in one timestamp would seem to make a lot of sense. After all, this will show up in my agenda as two apparently unrelated things. Besides, I should only have to put the information in once, not twice. -- Cameron Horsburgh Blog: http://spiritcry.wordpress.com/