From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broek@cc.umanitoba.ca Subject: RE: bug in todo state change tracking? Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:20:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20080610112055.vk1f0feysk4c0wg4@webware.cc.umanitoba.ca> References: <20080601231546.nmuvlebxss40owco@webware.cc.umanitoba.ca> <9592BB6CDB1CEB48826BE86ACD71FA996ABF7F@kwik.ic.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K66bB-0005yY-7L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:21:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K66b8-0005xL-Cd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:21:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34756 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K66b8-0005xI-4g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:21:26 -0400 Received: from electra.cc.umanitoba.ca ([130.179.16.23]:41462) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K66b7-0006kB-Pq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:21:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9592BB6CDB1CEB48826BE86ACD71FA996ABF7F@kwik.ic.uva.nl> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Dominik, C." Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org ----- Message from C.Dominik@uva.nl --------- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:10:04 +0200 From: "Dominik, C." Reply-To: "Dominik, C." Subject: RE: [Orgmode] bug in todo state change tracking? To: broek@cc.umanitoba.ca, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > Hi Brian, > > since we cannot reproduce this, it seems that you need to make > a minimal example, with a minimal .emacs file that > will reproduce the bug with > > emacs -q -l minimal.emacs ...... > > - Carsten Hi Carsten, Thanks, but I think you must have missed my follow-up post: . In sum: I'd made changes which didn't have the expected effect until I restarted emacs. Hope you didn't expend too much effort on the spurious report :-[ Best, Brian vdB