From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broek@cc.umanitoba.ca Subject: bug in todo state change tracking? Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 23:15:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20080601231546.nmuvlebxss40owco@webware.cc.umanitoba.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K31Sa-00020G-Hh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:15:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K31SZ-0001zi-43 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:15:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41435 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K31SZ-0001zf-1o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:15:51 -0400 Received: from electra.cc.umanitoba.ca ([130.179.16.23]:41569) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K31SY-0005Hc-Mx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:15:50 -0400 Received: from capella.cc.umanitoba.ca (server@capella.cc.umanitoba.ca [130.179.16.13]) by electra.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m524Fmbo019638 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:15:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from server@localhost) by capella.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.13.8+Sun/8.12.2) id m524FkGi019541 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:15:46 -0500 (CDT) Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten and all, I think I've found a small bug (6.04b on 22.1.1). I've got (setq org-todo-keywords '((sequence "TODO(t@)" "STARTED(s@)" "WAITING(w@)" "|" "DONE(d@)" "CANCELLED(c@)") (sequence "SOMEDAY(m@)" "|" "NEVER(n@)"))) in my .emacs. However, I get only a time-stamp and not also the note entry buffer when turning a headline into a TODO (regardless of whether the headline already had a todo state). Best, Brian