From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: Re: FR: multiple scheduling of one item? Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:55:02 +0000 Message-ID: <20080104095502.GH18716@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> References: <20071231152158.GN20947@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <43E2D02D-CF49-4074-98C0-58D93E7B05F3@gmail.com> <20080103223921.GB4991@fastwebnet.it> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAjGe-0006SM-4q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 04:55:09 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAjGb-0006Rx-7A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 04:55:06 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAjGa-0006Rr-NE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 04:55:04 -0500 Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAjGa-0002th-CX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 04:55:04 -0500 Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m049t3uV001593 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 03:55:03 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id m049t3fi001588 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:55:03 GMT Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080103223921.GB4991@fastwebnet.it> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:39:21PM +0100, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:44:08AM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Dec 31, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: > >> * Long task/project not yet broken down into sub-tasks > >> SCHEDULED: <2008-01-07 Mon> > >> SCHEDULED: <2008-01-08 Tue> > >> > >> and it appears in both places in an agenda view, and you can jump back > >> to the item in the normal way. The only downside is that C-c C-s > >> doesn't currently support entering it: > >> > >> (org-schedule &optional REMOVE) > > > > If I nt forward to implement this, should the extra SCHEDULED stamp > > be in the same second line of the entry, or in an extra line? Any > > other votes on this issue? > > I think it can be done in this way: > > * Long task > SCHEDULED: <2008-01-03 gio>--<2008-01-04 ven> > > Well, I've just written it (by hand ;-) and > I've scheduled "long task" in both days (today and tomorrow) in the Agenda. That's a nice idea, but it won't cover all eventualities, e.g. sometimes one would need: * Long task SCHEDULED: <2008-01-07 Mon 10:00-13:00> SCHEDULED: <2008-01-08 Tue 14:00-17:00>