From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giovanni Ridolfi Subject: Re: Re: FR: multiple scheduling of one item? Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:39:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20080103223921.GB4991@fastwebnet.it> References: <20071231152158.GN20947@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <43E2D02D-CF49-4074-98C0-58D93E7B05F3@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAYhH-0003hP-B8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:37:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAYhF-0003dL-K2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:37:54 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAYhF-0003d4-Go for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:37:53 -0500 Received: from aa013msr.fastwebnet.it ([85.18.95.73]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAYhE-0002wt-Un for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:37:53 -0500 Received: from localhost (37.254.28.138) by aa013msr.fastwebnet.it (7.3.118.6) id 46B1A27C09ED5A2A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 23:37:49 +0100 Received: from giovanni by localhost with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JAYif-0001hh-7b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 23:39:21 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43E2D02D-CF49-4074-98C0-58D93E7B05F3@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:44:08AM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Dec 31, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: > >> * Long task/project not yet broken down into sub-tasks >> SCHEDULED: <2008-01-07 Mon> >> SCHEDULED: <2008-01-08 Tue> >> >> and it appears in both places in an agenda view, and you can jump back >> to the item in the normal way. The only downside is that C-c C-s >> doesn't currently support entering it: >> >> (org-schedule &optional REMOVE) >> > > If I nt forward to implement this, should the extra SCHEDULED stamp > be in the same second line of the entry, or in an extra line? Any > other votes on this issue? I think it can be done in this way: * Long task SCHEDULED: <2008-01-03 gio>--<2008-01-04 ven> Well, I've just written it (by hand ;-) and I've scheduled "long task" in both days (today and tomorrow) in the Agenda. cheers, Giovanni