From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: Re: SOMEDAY/MAYBE vs. low priorities Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:15:24 +0000 Message-ID: <20071231171524.GQ20947@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> References: <20071230181116.GE20947@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <26163.1199054673@localhost> <20071231144414.GM20947@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J9OEa-0003iN-2r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J9OEX-0003i3-Vh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:26 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J9OEX-0003i0-PR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:25 -0500 Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J9OEX-00073s-HU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:15:25 -0500 Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id lBVHFOCP028356 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:15:24 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id lBVHFOKM028351 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:15:24 GMT Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071231144414.GM20947@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Adam Spiers (orgmode@adamspiers.org) wrote: > OK. My setup is similar except that I allow for sub-projects - > projects within projects. As a result, projects are not uniquely > identified by their star level, so I explicitly mark them with PROJECT > which means I retain the ability to do keyword searches on them. This > also has the advantage that I can include items for reference within > the project as sub-headings, and they won't have a keyword so they > won't show up in searches. OK, last one of the year honest! `org-stuck-projects' appears to get confused by sub-projects. If I set it to ("/PROJECT" ("TODO" "NEXT" "NEXTACTION" "STARTED") nil "") then in the following, it considers both the main and sub- projects as unstuck, when in fact only the sub-project is: * PROJECT main project ** NEXT main project is not stuck ** PROJECT sub-project *** sub-project is stuck