emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org>
To: org-mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: SOMEDAY/MAYBE vs. low priorities
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:11:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071230181116.GE20947@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> (raw)

GTD methodology suggests having "someday" and "maybe" task buckets for
things which you want to remember to do at some undetermined point in
the future.

So far I have implemented this in org-mode by using SOMEDAY and MAYBE
keywords.  However I have been deliberating whether in fact these
states are simply low priorities in disguise, and whether as a result
it would make more sense to use [#D] for "someday" and [#E] for
"maybe", on the grounds that "someday" implies that you really do want
to accomplish the task eventually, whereas "maybe" implies that you're
not yet decided whether you care too much if it ever gets
accomplished, and is hence lower priority than "someday" (and probably
the lowest priority imaginable, in fact).


  - Priorities become truly orthogonal to workflow, e.g. if your
    workflow keywords are PROJECT, PROJDONE, NEXT, STARTED, WAITING,
    DONE etc. then you can mark any of these as someday/maybe
    priority.  This is quite a big advantage AFAICS.


  - By default org agenda TODO searches will operate on all TODO
    entries, regardless of priority.  This means that you'd have to
    customise every existing agenda view of TODOs to restrict to only
    priorities #A to #C, which would be very cumbersome.

What do people think?  Are there other pros/cons, and is there a clean
solution to "generally" restricting TODO views to #C or higher

             reply	other threads:[~2007-12-30 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-30 18:11 Adam Spiers [this message]
2007-12-30 21:10 ` SOMEDAY/MAYBE vs. low priorities Eddward DeVilla
2007-12-30 22:44 ` Pete Phillips
2007-12-31 14:44   ` Adam Spiers
2007-12-31 17:09     ` Adam Spiers
2007-12-31 17:15     ` Adam Spiers
2007-12-31 17:25       ` Manish
2007-12-31 19:01     ` Pete Phillips

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071230181116.GE20947@atlantic.linksys.moosehall \
    --to=orgmode@adamspiers.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).