From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: Re: http://www.todotxt.org/ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:08:01 +0000 Message-ID: <20071107100801.GF13544@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> References: Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IphpO-0004uQ-VU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:08:07 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IphpO-0004tW-3p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:08:06 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IphpN-0004tN-Vx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:08:06 -0500 Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IphpN-00056l-JO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:08:05 -0500 Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id lA7A84JF001196 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 04:08:04 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id lA7A84tL001191 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:08:04 GMT Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 10:19:05PM +0000, Leo wrote: > Hi there, > > I came across www.todotxt.org and it looks like another good application > for managing todo (or applying GTD methodology). > > It is also based on text file. That's funny, I did something similar years ago: http://www.adamspiers.org/computing/ttm/ I never got into using it regularly however, because it just wasn't nimble or sophisticated enough.