From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Newman Subject: Re: Org-mode version 5.13 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:53:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20071026175308.67d389b7@newmanfamily.me.uk> References: <877ili13ju.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20071022223824.119eace4@newmanfamily.me.uk> <3BA1CB6B-5943-465C-A466-DA1B7BDC38F8@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IlSQx-0008WQ-04 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:53:19 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IlSQt-0008U1-Ah for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:53:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlSQt-0008Tv-1b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:53:15 -0400 Received: from smtp2.enta.net ([62.249.192.218]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IlSQs-0005Fk-NJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:53:14 -0400 Received: from newmanfamily.me.uk (84-45-232-14.no-dns-yet.enta.net [84.45.232.14]) by smtp2.enta.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6A814DC8A for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:58:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from newmanfamily.me.uk (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by newmanfamily.me.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9QGr8WP002822 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:53:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:12:36 +0500 "Dmitri Minaev" wrote: > Wouldn't classes make formatting more flexible? If I understand > correctly, Mike Newman's proposal will require all formatting to be > hardcoded into org.el? I'd rather keep it in a separate .css file, one > for the whole site... > > That is certainly not my intention. I think keeping style information in a separate file is a good idea. -- Mike