From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org>
Subject: Re: Free `1' and `0' keys from the org-agenda interface ?
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:03:03 +0100
Message-ID: <20071017170303.GC10874@atlantic.linksys.moosehall>
References: <87ejfvm0s3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<20071016163144.GE3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall>
	<87wstnkkt0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<20071016173953.GB32678@atlantic.linksys.moosehall>
	<87ve96kayj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<bb09e941e67074c62de1858bbae9c764@science.uva.nl>
Reply-To: Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IiCIX-0003rU-6A
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:03:09 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IiCIU-0003r9-Sc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:03:07 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IiCIU-0003r6-Mu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:03:06 -0400
Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <f5-sendmail@adamspiers.org>) id 1IiCIU-0000Nd-3x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:03:06 -0400
Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
	l9HH34MH021856
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:03:04 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
	by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id
	l9HH34mI021849
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:03:04 +0100
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <bb09e941e67074c62de1858bbae9c764@science.uva.nl>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:47:58PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2007, at 23:26, Bastien wrote:
> >Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org> writes:
> >
> >>>`< <' : cycle through default restricted states (see above)
> >>
> >>Hmm, that doubles the number of keypresses to achieve a given state,
> >>which is a bit cumbersome.  But if it's customizable, who cares? :-)
> >
> >I wouldn't mind having single keys to achieve this - it's just that I
> >thought `1' and `0' where not the best choice.
> 
> Yes, I can see that the 0 and one would be useful in other 
> circumstances.
> And I don't *relly* think that a double "<" would be so bad, because
> don't think restricting an agenda command to a region or subtree is
> used frequently, is it?

I have recently started using it quite a lot, e.g. to narrow to my
work or personal TODOs, which are both in files of their own.

But if sub-keymaps were to be implemented, this would be customizable
anyway, so we wouldn't need to worry about it.