Re: Free `1' and `0' keys from the org-agenda interface ?

[Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org>]

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 05:47:58PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2007, at 23:26, Bastien wrote:
> >Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org> writes:
> >
> >>>`< <' : cycle through default restricted states (see above)
> >>
> >>Hmm, that doubles the number of keypresses to achieve a given state,
> >>which is a bit cumbersome.  But if it's customizable, who cares? :-)
> >
> >I wouldn't mind having single keys to achieve this - it's just that I
> >thought `1' and `0' where not the best choice.
> 
> Yes, I can see that the 0 and one would be useful in other 
> circumstances.
> And I don't *relly* think that a double "<" would be so bad, because
> don't think restricting an agenda command to a region or subtree is
> used frequently, is it?

I have recently started using it quite a lot, e.g. to narrow to my
work or personal TODOs, which are both in files of their own.

But if sub-keymaps were to be implemented, this would be customizable
anyway, so we wouldn't need to worry about it.