From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org>
Subject: Re: Free `1' and `0' keys from the org-agenda interface ?
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:31:44 +0100
Message-ID: <20071016163144.GE3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall>
References: <87ejfvm0s3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Reply-To: Adam Spiers <orgmode@adamspiers.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhpKd-0002e0-8u
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:31:47 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhpKc-0002db-QN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:31:46 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhpKc-0002dY-ML
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:31:46 -0400
Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <f5-sendmail@adamspiers.org>) id 1IhpKc-0003FT-Dy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:31:46 -0400
Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id
	l9GGVjFE004094
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:31:45 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
	by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id
	l9GGVjgQ004087
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:31:45 +0100
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87ejfvm0s3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien (bzg@altern.org) wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> i'd like to have your opinion on this.
> 
> I tend to use my `org-agenda-custom-commands' in a strict order.  
> I first check for a first view, then check for a second view, etc.  
> It would be nice to be able to use `1' for the first view -- but
> it's currently used to restrict the agenda view to the buffer.
> 
> My suggestion for a possible replacement for the `1' and `0' keys 
> would be this:
> 
>  `<' : restrict to the buffer
> `<<' : restrict to the region or subtree
> 
> Note: `<' could also be `@' since `C-c @' means select the current
> subtree.
> 
> I think it's okay to have some kind of "incremental" restriction,
> but I'm not sure about this.  And I'd definitely like to have the
> [0-9] keys for my own agenda views :)

Wow, what can I say?  I think those two mails arrived with 30 seconds
of each other - great minds think alike ;-)

I'm only just starting to use custom commands; however, your comment
about typically invoking custom commands in a strict order doesn't
surprise me.  I might well find my usage habits following the same
trait.

I'm curious about your suggestion of '<<' though - does that imply the
sub-keymap functionality I asked for already exists?