From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: Re: FR: toggling timestamps active/inactive Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:22:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20071016162258.GD3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> References: <20071016141902.GB3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <4714E142.2020805@calicojack.co.uk> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhpC9-00006b-4E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:23:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhpC8-00005h-9A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:23:00 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhpC7-00005Q-Ud for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:23:00 -0400 Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IhpC7-0001Pc-Mj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:22:59 -0400 Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l9GGMwUn003214 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:22:58 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id l9GGMw38003209 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:22:58 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4714E142.2020805@calicojack.co.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rick Moynihan (rick@calicojack.co.uk) wrote: > Adam Spiers wrote: > >Hi Carsten, > > > >Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I > >think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and > ><>. > > > >Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently > >told my presence at the event is no longer necessary. Consequently I > >would like to keep it in the file for reference, to track colleagues' > >movements or in case my presence is re-required, but I don't want the > >event to appear in the agenda. > > > >By the way, I probably could have coded this in the time it took to > >write the mail, but I thought that until I've sent a piece of paper to > >the FSF assigning rights for code contributed to org-mode and emacs, > >it would be better to let Carsten write it. Is that correct or flawed > >thinking? > > > > This seems like a good idea. Another related one occurred to me today > (if it's necessary) which is toggling between the two list indicators. > > e.g. > > - foo > - bar > - baz |<-- Point > > Calling the toggle-list-indicator function at the point will cause the > list indicator to change from a - to a + (and vice versa). Nice idea! Or even between - and *** at the current level. Maybe that should cycle. Or maybe there are already existing keybindings which distinguish between new - and *** entries? M-RET doesn't always DWIM, personally.