From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: FR: toggling timestamps active/inactive Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:19:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20071016141902.GB3018@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhnGE-00010I-Tz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:19:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhnGD-0000yk-Re for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:19:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhnGD-0000yU-M7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:19:05 -0400 Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IhnGD-0005Zx-9r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:19:05 -0400 Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l9GEJ3ZI018440 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:19:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id l9GEJ3MV018435 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:19:03 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list Hi Carsten, Another simple idea - subject line is pretty much self-explanatory I think: would be great to be able to toggle timestamps between [] and <>. Why? Say I have an event in my diary.org file, and am subsequently told my presence at the event is no longer necessary. Consequently I would like to keep it in the file for reference, to track colleagues' movements or in case my presence is re-required, but I don't want the event to appear in the agenda. By the way, I probably could have coded this in the time it took to write the mail, but I thought that until I've sent a piece of paper to the FSF assigning rights for code contributed to org-mode and emacs, it would be better to let Carsten write it. Is that correct or flawed thinking?