From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell Adams Subject: Re: depending TODOs, scheduling following TODOs automatically Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 15:12:23 -0500 Message-ID: <20071008201223.GC10774@odin.demosthenes.org> References: <6dbd4d000710080626i52f0f0t9354addc33c0efee@mail.gmail.com> <20071008134353.GA10774@odin.demosthenes.org> <20071008135240.GB10774@odin.demosthenes.org> <4451bef76a71d49ffc88d9d8b87f2940@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ieyxp-0000Qh-5E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:12:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ieyxm-0000Ld-Lc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:12:28 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ieyxm-0000LJ-Gm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:12:26 -0400 Received: from squirtle.drak.net ([72.52.144.201]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ieyxm-00048e-GG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 16:12:26 -0400 Received: from 206.180.154.177.adsl.hal-pc.org ([206.180.154.177] helo=localhost) by squirtle.drak.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Ieyxd-0000YQ-4v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:12:17 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4451bef76a71d49ffc88d9d8b87f2940@science.uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2007, at 15:52, Russell Adams wrote: > > >I know I'm replying to myself, but I had an idea. > > > >If a link could show the state of a linked TODO, that would make for a > >good visualization. I could then follow the link and just adjust my > >order to account for dependencies. It sounds like a more "permanent" > >agenda view that you could edit to get the right order. > > > >Ie: > > > >* Things to do in reverse order > >** TODO One > >** TODO Two > >** TODO Three > > > >* Implementation Order > > > > TODO Three > > TODO Two > > TODO One > > I don't know what others think, but I did not understand a single word > of this message :-) Could you please be a bit more verbose? > > - Carsten I don't use links often... If I could have a link to another TODO item, but have the visible portion of the link display the status of the target TODO item. Ie: * Things to do in reverse order ** TODO One ** TODO Two ** DONE Three * Implementation Order [[file:..*Three][DONE Three]] [[file:..*Two][TODO Two]] [[file:..*One][TODO One]] This way I can follow the link from the implementation order to the right todo item, the part that is missing is an automated state update regarding the TODO linked to. Better? ;] Russell ------------------------------------------------------------------ Russell Adams RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.com PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3 http://www.adamsinfoserv.com/ Fingerprint: 1723 D8CA 4280 1EC9 557F 66E8 1154 E018 1160 DCB3