From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Feature request: Selective encryption
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 10:20:42 +0200
Message-ID: <200709020820.l828KgGD005350@localhost.localdomain>
References: <m2veaws8jk.fsf@newartisans.com>
	<f1d16773688c3f70ccb93211e8d0051a@science.uva.nl>
	<m2bqcna4hf.fsf@newartisans.com>
Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IRkuO-0000DN-IG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:34:16 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IRkuM-0000C6-Ry
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:34:16 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRkuM-0000Bb-0J
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:34:14 -0400
Received: from master.uucpssh.org ([193.218.105.66])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <xma@gnu.org>) id 1IRkuL-0001ZQ-Dk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:34:13 -0400
In-reply-to: <m2bqcna4hf.fsf@newartisans.com> (message from John Wiegley on
	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:28:12 -0400)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Wiegley <johnw@newartisans.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi John,

[congratulations for your paper on your org usage, this is wonderful]

   Yes, this is just what I'm thinking too, though I'd like the option of binding
   different CRYPT tags to different keys or passwords.  So, I could have
   WORK_CRYPT, HOME_CRYPT, etc., and each would have its own separate protection.
   This would allow multiple people to have their own private regions within the
   same org-mode file.

I agree with that.

   allout.el goes a long way toward providing all of the above, I just wasn't
   fond of the mechanism (I tried porting it straight to org-mode one day, then
   stopped).  For one thing, I want to use my GnuPG public key for encryption,
   not a symmetric cipher.  That needs to be configurable.

I do not see how you would use multiple keys/password per file
with only your GNUpg key. Did I miss something here ?


	Xavier
-- 
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org