From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Spiers Subject: Re: counter-intuitive key bindings Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:22:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20070901102215.GB21545@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> References: <20070728125242.GC22472@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Reply-To: Adam Spiers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQ7O-0001X2-UY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:22:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQ7N-0001WB-Av for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:22:18 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRQ7N-0001W6-3p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:22:17 -0400 Received: from mail.beimborn.com ([70.84.38.100]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IRQ7M-00016W-N5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:22:16 -0400 Received: from mail.beimborn.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l81AMF3V013010 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 05:22:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by mail.beimborn.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id l81AMFq9013004 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:22:15 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik (dominik@science.uva.nl) wrote: > On Jul 28, 2007, at 14:52, Adam Spiers wrote: > >On a related topic, if I have S-{left,right} on my org-disputed-keys > >list, this breaks using them for changing a timestamp by one-day > >increments, even though I don't consider that a clashing binding. I > >guess I am arguing that this is a minor bug with `org-key' being too > >indiscriminate in when it filters bindings. > > Why do you then have these keys on your list? What are you > using them for? How is org-mode supposed to know in what > situations you don't what org-mode to use them? You're quite right of course :-) It's up to me to override them in the specific maps in which I want them overridden.