From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Arkell Subject: Re: Re: [org-babel] Does org-babel needs some simplification? Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:56:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1D7EB286-88AA-4515-A051-FE2C7DA1ED82@criticalmass.com> References: <4C296DDA.1080109@gmail.com> <871vbos4hu.fsf@systemhaus-brunner.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48436 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OU5Ha-0003qt-4P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:57:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU5HY-0005C3-N6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:57:26 -0400 Received: from brewer.cmass.criticalmass.com ([207.61.21.2]:14560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU5HY-00057k-Fe for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:57:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871vbos4hu.fsf@systemhaus-brunner.de> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Daniel Brunner Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" __________________________________ Jonathan Arkell Tech Lead Inspired By Drum & Bass, Scheme, Kawaii p. 403.206.4377 402 -- 11th Ave SE Calgary, AB, Canada T2G 0Y4 jonathana@criticalmass.com criticalmass.com Hi Daniel I would say, that if you absolutely need a productive environment, then you= should stick to the official releases, rather then the latest and greatest= , as sad as that might sound. Conversely, if things break the next time you do a git pull, you could pull= from a previous version to see if it is still broken. It's bleeding edge for a reason! On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Daniel Brunner wrote: > Hello everyone, > > thanks for bringing this topic up. I do not want to be misunderstood: > org-mode is one of the greatest things developed the last years. I use > it every day and it is a great help. I also appreciate the work of all > those developers contributing to org-mode / babel. > > My setup is: I use the git repository because I like some of the new > features und from time to time I "pull" the new things. Normalley a > "make" does the job and flipping through the log messages helps me to > understand the new things. I use org-mode on my main business machine; > ok, perhaps it is a bit risky. And I try to use as much as possible > "out-of-the-box". > > But then my .emacs reported problems: org-babel has changed its place > and the way it is loaded. I found the reason for that in the news > group. But then the nice patch by Eric Schulte for tangling "org-mode" > files doesn't work any more because "org-babel-tangle-langs" does not > exist any more. And David Maus' addition org-atom for generating atom > feeds is broken because there is something with a > org-export-inbuffer-options-extra variable (which is not a org-babel > problem as I suppose). > > I know, org-mode is a growing project and I really really like the > org-babel features. But for me it is now not advisable any more to keep > on the master branch. Today I spent several hours for finding the > reasons why something is not working any more. And that is too much for > a productive environment. > > Today, I am a bit sad about my broken org-mode installation and I am > going back to the 6.36c. > > Kind regards, Daniel. > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode The information contained in this message is confidential. It is intended t= o be read only by the individual or entity named above or their designee. I= f the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby = notified that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly pr= ohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately no= tify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message.