From: peter.frings@agfa.com
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: missing todo's in agenda after emacs/org upgrade
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:39:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1BFB86EA-19DB-4B0E-9AAF-936CEB691A7B@agfa.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E8186B4-9DCF-4750-A083-870B2B23F784@gmail.com>
On 19 Aug 2011, at 13:05, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Peter Frings wrote:
>> On 19 Aug 2011, at 11:59, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>
>>> The two main issues you are having are these:
>>>
>>> 1. There is no simple way for beginners to get both TODO and agenda in one view
>>> 2. Moving through time does not work in a block view when the cursor is in the TODO list.
>> Fixing 2 would be great. Maybe there are other keystrokes that can be delegated to other blocks (e.g. in order of appearance) if the currently-focussed block doesn’t handle them?
> The reason why this would be confusing is that there might be
> several blocks which accept a particular command, so it would
> be unclear for the code how to select one, and even more
> difficult for the user to have an intuitive feeling on what was
> changed why….
I can understand that this requires quite some changes and that it might be a lot of work. However, I don’t think it would be counter-intuitive, unless there are many conflicting commands (i.e., a same keystroke that has a different effect depending on the block type). Are there that many? E.g., take the ‘w’ or ‘d’ keys in the agenda view. Suppose I’m on the TODO block and type a ‘w’. Would it be that much surprising if the agenda block switches to a week view? Probably not.
Of course, there might be sufficient cases that prove me wrong; after all I’m not really familiar with the different blocks. So I’ll stop nagging :-)
I’ll swap the order as you suggested and give it a try!
Thanks!
Peter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-19 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-18 13:58 missing todo's in agenda after emacs/org upgrade Peter Frings
2011-08-18 14:45 ` suvayu ali
2011-08-18 16:36 ` peter.frings
2011-08-18 16:44 ` suvayu ali
2011-08-18 17:41 ` peter.frings
2011-08-18 21:01 ` Puneeth Chaganti
2011-08-18 21:16 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-08-19 9:02 ` peter.frings
2011-08-19 9:59 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-08-19 10:35 ` Peter Frings
2011-08-19 10:42 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-08-19 11:05 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-08-19 11:39 ` peter.frings [this message]
2011-08-19 20:30 ` Viktor Rosenfeld
2011-08-19 10:33 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-08-19 13:08 ` Bastien
2011-08-19 13:12 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-08-19 13:23 ` Bastien
2011-08-19 13:56 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-08-18 21:51 ` suvayu ali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1BFB86EA-19DB-4B0E-9AAF-936CEB691A7B@agfa.com \
--to=peter.frings@agfa.com \
--cc=carsten.dominik@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).