From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jordi Inglada Subject: Re: Title page for book latex export Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:36:04 +0200 Message-ID: <19645.44244.603501.187098@goeland.ups-tlse.fr> References: <19644.5557.627178.686601@goeland.ups-tlse.fr> <9312871.193.1287423634931.JavaMail.root@zm-cesbio-01> <19644.43988.128890.607963@goeland.ups-tlse.fr> <28722569.197.1287437982941.JavaMail.root@zm-cesbio-01> <19645.14060.654947.268170@goeland.ups-tlse.fr> <493995.8239.1287496847211.JavaMail.root@zm-cesbio-01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50511 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8DIR-0001Bz-00 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:36:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8DIO-0005uu-WE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:36:10 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:59177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8DIO-0005tl-RW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:36:08 -0400 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so1808393fxm.0 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:36:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <493995.8239.1287496847211.JavaMail.root@zm-cesbio-01> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org No problem. And thanks again for your help. Jordi Nick Dokos writes: > Jordi Inglada wrote: > > > > Nick Dokos writes: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Sorry. I did not notice that my not understanding what the problem was > > was going to upset anybody. I'll be more careful next time. > > > > A couple of points: > > o although I meant what I said in the seriously, I was not > upset. I guess my humor is dry as dust, but I can assure you I > was chuckling while composing the mail. > > o I *certainly* was not upset at your not understanding the problem. > This is exactly what the list is about. And your question was > entirely appropriate for the list. > > o Although your post was the trigger, the rant was not meant for you > personally: it was meant for the whole list. It is often the case > that people describe a problem with very little detail and it > takes a series of back-and-forths before we can really understand > what the problem is. Sometimes that's inevitable but many times > it can be avoided. My suggestion was to include enough detail > in the original report so the back-and-forth can be avoided to > the extent possible. > > So I hope I did not offend you and if I did offend you, I apologize: > that was not my purpose at all, and a rant that offends but does not > educate is no good at all. > > Nick > >