From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: org-mode on sloooow computer Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:19:59 +0100 Message-ID: <18930.51119.722314.498714@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> References: <87hc0fe35v.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <5A8DAF72-27D1-4BC5-B70C-884E2F98620B@gmail.com> <18928.59232.992700.573573@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <18929.30496.879823.967736@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <49F1C0AD.7090309@diplan.de> <18929.57089.531617.730982@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <3F3FAB94-BF93-4BC5-8698-4240A21FA67F@gmail.com> <18930.15516.830598.234897@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> Reply-To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lxd7O-0006cS-Dp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:20:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lxd7I-0006bx-7T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:20:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54449 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lxd7H-0006bu-SL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:20:07 -0400 Received: from vscane-b.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.141]:42131) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lxd7G-0005Rp-Rz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 04:20:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: From: Eric S Fraga List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: > > Ummm, this doesn't work for me? C-c C-x r is undefined. > > You need to be in an org-mode buffer for this.. Ah. Yes. > > In any case, I am impressed: from 4.5 seconds to less than a second in > > one day! Can you do the same for my 2+ day optimisation runs I > > require in my research? ;-) > > :-) Someone needs to write a profiler for that. In fact, clocking your > work and looking at the biggest time consumers may help :-) Yes. I do profile my codes very often. The current codes (for this particular problem) are about as efficient as I can make them. The problems I tackle are simply inherently difficult or complex. > Thanks, this was a fun day. Excellent! A bit of hacking of this type can indeed be fun. And provides a nice diversion from the more humdrum aspects of our work... (my students are all revising for their final exams... ;-). eric