From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: org-mode on sloooow computer Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:47:13 +0100 Message-ID: <18929.57089.531617.730982@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> References: <87hc0fe35v.fsf@eeepc.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <5A8DAF72-27D1-4BC5-B70C-884E2F98620B@gmail.com> <18928.59232.992700.573573@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <18929.30496.879823.967736@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> <49F1C0AD.7090309@diplan.de> Reply-To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LxNci-00069F-Iu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:47:32 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LxNcd-00066i-11 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:47:31 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39608 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LxNcc-00066X-UC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:47:26 -0400 Received: from vscane-c.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.43]:40425) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LxNcc-0008RM-Gn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:47:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: From: Eric S Fraga List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rainer Stengele Carsten Dominik writes: > On Apr 24, 2009, at 3:37 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote: > > > Hi Carsten, > > > > strange enough the latest git version does not improve time for my > > agenda at all. > > It still is as slow or fast - however you see it. > > I think you have tag inheritance turned off, or you have everything in > top-level entries. > > From todays adjustments, the people who will benefit the most are > those who have a very large number of siblings on arbitrary levels, > and who, at the same time, use tag inheritance. Carsten, I definitely fall into the tag inheritance with large number of siblings on arbitrary levels category! FYI, here is another data point for analysis. I've downloaded the latest git version: commit 4b6f0cf77b941bdaf7d784215d1977f7ea58f550 Author: Carsten Dominik Date: Fri Apr 24 16:45:01 2009 +0200 Optimization: Make org-end-of-subtree much faster and these are the first few lines of the profiling information (I can send all output if you wish) which show another further significant improvement! This is fantastic. org-agenda 1 1.354913 1.354913 org-agenda-list 1 1.082066 1.082066 org-dblock-write:clocktable 7 0.541785 0.0773978571 org-agenda-get-day-entries 6 0.430589 0.0717648333 org-get-clocktable 1 0.384531 0.384531 org-update-dblock 1 0.349331 0.349331 org-prepare-agenda-buffers 2 0.340886 0.170443 org-agenda-get-scheduled 6 0.289391 0.0482318333 org-agenda-get-restriction-and-command 1 0.272534 0.272534 org-get-tags-at 8 0.2238899999 0.0279862499 org-up-heading-all 21 0.2201879999 0.0104851428 ... Thanks again, eric