On 05/10/2024 18:35, idlip at protonmail.com wrote:
> > In Emacs -Q there is not this issue.
>
> This indicates the issue is with your config.
Yes, that's for sure.
>
> I suspect it can be from theme.

When I make a search for "theme" word in my init.el file, I get just one 
result:

  '(custom-safe-themes '(default))

>
> Are you sure there is no config editing org-level-* faces somewhere?

When I make a search for "org-level", I only get org-level as 
inheritance (aside from the set-face-attribute I shared before). Example:

  '(org-upcoming-deadline ((t (:inherit org-level-3))))

>
> > (set-face-attribute 'org-level-1 nil :inherit 'org-default :height 1.5)
> > (set-face-attribute 'org-level-2 nil :inherit 'org-level-1 :height 1.4)
> > (set-face-attribute 'org-level-3 nil :inherit 'org-level-1 :height 1.2)
>
> Also do note height work as an increment from inherited value. It does
> override. So according to this config org-level-2 height will be 1.4x
> times that of org-level-1.
Yes, the problem by now is that I don't get any change in org-level-2, 
3, etc. whatever the value I set.
>
> > When I evaluate (describe-face) on any headline level, it consistently
> > reports that it is org-level-1.
> I assume you are calling it interactively (via M-x), this gets
> completing-read and allows you to select. Maybe you got only org-level-1
> and selectec it?

I call (describe-face) interactively, and it offers a default selection.

This default selection is always the face where the point is on. 
Although the point was on a headline of level 2, 3, etc, when calling 
(describe-face) the default selected face is always org-level-1.

>
> Try this,
>
> (set-face-attribute 'org-level-1 nil :height 1.5 :foreground "#b4befe")
> (set-face-attribute 'org-level-2 nil :height 1.4 :foreground "#f5deb5")

org-level-1 changes are applied to every org-level:

https://ibb.co/XW2KSF3

>
> Again, if it works in emacs -Q or vanilla org-mode. You need to debug
> your init and theme.

I know. I tried bug hunter.

Any help?

>
> -- 
> Best,
> Dilip
Best regards!