Re: transclusion, tangling, flycheck/flymake, etc.

[Greg Minshall <minshall@umich.edu>]

Ihor,

thanks for the clarification.

maybe, in that ideal world, <<name()>> might expand, optionally.

another point: watching Noboru's "most recent" (9?) video, i see another
feature of his transclusion: a way to say, "this is *exactly* like a
source block -- with language, :results, :tangle, :var, etc.,
... except, the actual code is in some other file: when i hit =C-c C-c=
here, please set up (based on language), include that source, execute
it".

that also might be interesting.  if i were to think of that, i'd say the
verb might *not* be =#+transclude=, but, rather, something source
specific (=#+src_ref=?).  but, it might allow a =:transclude yes=
property.

cheers, Greg