From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Suggestion for org-sort Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:42:57 +0100 Message-ID: <157E4EA1-F638-4A6C-B955-7B71422DD61C@gmail.com> References: <5ea706d0712081311g5c6b5ecbo58025240a54fcd97@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAnlK-0005Kl-4J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:43:06 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAnlH-0005KZ-Rf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:43:05 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAnlH-0005KW-Hm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:43:03 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAnlH-0004rN-3n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:43:03 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so3180943ugf.48 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:43:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5ea706d0712081311g5c6b5ecbo58025240a54fcd97@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Chris Leyon Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Dec 8, 2007, at 10:11 PM, Chris Leyon wrote: > I ran into this behavior while sorting table lines but it may happen > elsewhere too. In a nutshell, I'd like to alphabetical-sort (C-c ^ a) > > | alpha | > | [[file:beta][beta]] | > | gamma | > > into the order shown, but currently the "beta" line sorts less than > "alpha". I can't claim it's a bug--the behavior is > understandable--but perhaps the sort function can be enhanced to only > look at the link description, if present. Fixed, thanks. - Carsten