From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thomas S. Dye" Subject: Re: typo, sp at C++ Source Code Blocks in Org Mode Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 06:45:01 -1000 Message-ID: <1541868301.4541.0@smtp.gmail.com> References: <1541782329.10143.0@smtp.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-JkFLhpLWV93ICH/QBStt" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLWOH-0003Iy-KV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 11:45:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLWNf-0006gW-44 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 11:45:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]:38701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLWNe-0006g1-Si for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 11:45:07 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id b11-v6so2321640pfi.5 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 08:45:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Van L Cc: emacs-org list --=-JkFLhpLWV93ICH/QBStt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Aloha Van L, On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Van L wrote: > >> AFAIK there is no mechanism to have changes in one propagate >> changes in the other. > > It should be possible to link the two because both are org files. > > Worg would need to render to info:worg. That's an interesting idea. AFAICT it should be possible. Nevertheless, my guess is that it would be a lot of work to mark up the Worg sources to get well-formatted info output. All the best, Tom --=-JkFLhpLWV93ICH/QBStt Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Aloha Van L,


On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Van L <van@scratch.space> wrote:
AFAIK there is no mechanism to have changes in one propagate changes in the other.
It should be possible to link the two because both are org files. Worg would need to render to info:worg.

That's an interesting idea. AFAICT it should be possible. Nevertheless, my guess is that it would be a lot of work to mark up the Worg sources to get well-formatted info output.

All the best,
Tom
--=-JkFLhpLWV93ICH/QBStt--