From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:16:44 -0500 Message-ID: <15074.1295540204@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrs3hge.fsf@gmail.com> <871v48s3xu.fsf@fastmail.fm> <10576.1295493005@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87mxmvy43m.fsf@fastmail.fm> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42315 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pfymd-0000H0-AF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:58:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfymb-0007MR-Vv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:58:55 -0500 Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.33]:37943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pfymb-0007M3-QQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:58:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message from Matt Lundin of "Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:41:49 EST." <87mxmvy43m.fsf@fastmail.fm> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matt Lundin Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Jason Dunsmore , Bastien , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Matt Lundin wrote: > Nick Dokos writes: > > > Matt Lundin wrote: > > > >> So the new, "flat" FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all are > >> welcome to suggest or contribute further refinements. > >> > > > > Blue (or purple or similar color) text on black background is unreadable - > > at least to my eyes. > > I agree. I reverted the black background. > > If a dark background is preferred, we'll need to make sure that we > export an entire dark color theme (such as zenburn) with > org-export-htmlize-generate-css. > > As it stood, we were simply using a black background with colors > exported from a light theme (e.g, dark blue headlines). Needless to say, > this made the text unreadable. :) > Much better! Thanks, Nick