From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Updating Worg re standard source block syntax
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:01:38 -0500
Message-ID: <14015.1322002898@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <m2sjlfzvd5.fsf@btinternet.com>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36660)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1RSzLR-0007MB-PF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:01:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1RSzLQ-00085B-Nf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:01:41 -0500
Received: from g6t0186.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.63]:45800)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1RSzLQ-000857-Js
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:01:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: Message from Martyn Jago <martyn.jago@btinternet.com>
	of "Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:43:18 GMT." <m2sjlfzvd5.fsf@btinternet.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Martyn Jago <martyn.jago@btinternet.com>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Martyn Jago <martyn.jago@btinternet.com> wrote:

> There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within
> Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg
> reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding
> edge (I tend to assume the latter because of the Org community spirit of
> Worg), but I fail to find any specific notice regarding this.
> 
> Advice would be appreciated since I've found myself appreciating, and
> adding to Worg more and more - and it seems to me it is a real quality of
> Org that Worg can exist in the first place.
> 

Is there any way to find out what the org version is at the worg site?
This is something that I've wondered about in the past, but I keep
forgetting to ask the question. E.g. it would be good to know the
version, so when I make a change to worg content and test the change by
publishing the site locally, I can use the exact version that is going
to be used on the real site. Right now, I test with whatever version is
running on my machine, which can lead to false conclusions (both positive
and negative).

Nick