From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Soapy Smith <soapy-smith@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: update to ob-clojure.el
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:20:34 -0400
Message-ID: <1397402434.2038.7.camel@raven-CM5571>
References: <CAA01p3r0CKjLEbsxDU8T291=ic+hqMau12fz0WPe+bCCMroYOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45825)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <soapy-smith@comcast.net>) id 1WZMDL-0006ec-6w
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:21:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <soapy-smith@comcast.net>) id 1WZMDD-0007Js-Cd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:20:59 -0400
Received: from qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.212]:51559)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <soapy-smith@comcast.net>) id 1WZMDD-0007Jf-8G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:20:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAA01p3r0CKjLEbsxDU8T291=ic+hqMau12fz0WPe+bCCMroYOQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Oleh <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>
Cc: org mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 10:36 +0200, Oleh wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've made an update to ob-clojure.el, which wasn't working for me with
> the new cider (the required function was removed).
> 
> I haven't looked into 'nrepl or 'slime options for evaluation, is
> anyone using them?
> 
> Eric, should 'nrepl option be removed as obsolete? And maybe 'slime as well?
> 
> regards,
> Oleh

I'm not sure about removing nrepl and slime, as there may be some still
using them, especially nrepl.  As long as it is not getting in the way,
perhaps at this time it would be better to leave them in?  I'm not sure
the open-source and/or emacs-org philosophy on this kind of thing.

Prior to updating the documentation for Clojure code blocks earlier this
year, which was several years old, I did a lot of searching around and
came to the conclusion that the slime and swank-clojure functionality
was no longer being developed, and the community had moved on to nrepl.
CIDER evolved from nrepl, and is the current direction.

https://github.com/clojure-emacs/cider

The revised documentation is very "CIDER-centric":

http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/ob-doc-clojure.html

Regards,
Greg