From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id CGgOBErVmWELoQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 06:12:42 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id cBRUO0nVmWGcGwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 05:12:41 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C538A45F for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 06:12:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47286 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mof9a-0006wv-Vs for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 00:12:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mof8M-0006wh-4K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 00:11:22 -0500 Received: from relay-egress-host.us-east-2.a.mail.umich.edu ([18.216.144.57]:34300 helo=sweet-olwen.relay-egress.a.mail.umich.edu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mof8K-0005QF-BU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 00:11:21 -0500 Received: from sisterly-brounie.authn-relay.a.mail.umich.edu (ip-10-0-74-155.us-east-2.compute.internal [10.0.74.155]) by sweet-olwen.relay-egress.a.mail.umich.edu with ESMTPS id 6199D4F2.933AF.186455DE.1157138; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 00:11:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=relay-2018-08-29; t=1637471474; bh=8uIt1mzyWful+I3G/ALZg5K0vyPSZAhL30dzlZvIY70=; h=To:cc:From:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date; b=GSmZDpqZTpfiGZO9hsv1SkM2dA3eo59ZiHihVicVc2Mwh1GkExX1BduIeOlkxlrE+ pVVWN+Lfl4Mzluu8VN1e0e8ORbNVkOIIEhg+Fx/i8O7TFHl2rg7ir5oV+AlPSEBOv5 h0Cku5a2lSo4bjjOdnp6Oi/DK20KAKXdBzqF7+KCEp7Ujy1A1zFDNBp4A/k53/pRAo sOR3aIEA36jrPgxVVb/TeVBEVvtBgV1dbVxUfFLb5Hs3PdG75qLKMn/K7UJ5NXUNZ1 7IiYMnY30ryribUIjrrdf6kKDXtBURXrgtslKHp9RRvp1uh7pzKITLwp7F9rg6ckdL nOVmfLELUa4lA== Received: from localhost (Mismatch [88.236.240.156]) by sisterly-brounie.authn-relay.a.mail.umich.edu with ESMTPSA id 6199D4F0.B8A61.6DCEFD85.2841063; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 00:11:13 -0500 To: Timothy From: Greg Minshall Subject: Re: [PATCH] Accept more :tangle-mode specification forms In-reply-to: <87v90m6sfr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <875yuh9b3t.fsf@gmail.com> <87czojh6m4.fsf@gmail.com> <8735ntg3ve.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtm1e5lt.fsf@gmail.com> <87pmqwt6zi.fsf@gmail.com> <874k87850s.fsf@gmail.com> <8735nq98h3.fsf@gmail.com> <1383690.1637467696@apollo2.minshall.org> <87v90m6sfr.fsf@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Timothy message dated "Sun, 21 Nov 2021 12:27:56 +0800." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 08:11:08 +0300 Message-ID: <1396849.1637471468@apollo2.minshall.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=18.216.144.57; envelope-from=minshall@umich.edu; helo=sweet-olwen.relay-egress.a.mail.umich.edu X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tomas@tuxteam.de, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1637471561; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=8uIt1mzyWful+I3G/ALZg5K0vyPSZAhL30dzlZvIY70=; b=P/wCca8kSvzGSMgp7dPk8mYxrgJqtkrEbDsgAzKtZwS8G5vDXF4eZnPt5wi3wtIl6ZJJWY JN53kn3Ytlt79hI1cszoid+fL6C66/UWJSva4E3GU+OragfCLhXqZatdt2MW63BD0ISZ+P +Q9i9vCFzbVsU6OdAeq4jhyWGnpv7Yy1sZ4hus0TADfeo5eNCDSxWFHLRhJEpLohzVHx+U 5F1bIM8KBshrpHiu6KQo4nFr0JozGiVlC8XIp5J4kuelbsuSVcETxZiCciU7UqLvZDputF GmQHu+RT30tU4c4KU0NXVzh7oII5FDiIAJByiQGpw9gV98seyNhNDp9X1cR+Jw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1637471561; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=PpuCC/4XvmmUETIxN/cTel/tFOf2mfsx6ByGubvYIUY9OwGDPir+f1cv3vb74bHzxqrO1L 76N7prHUXfk/JKpCmRXwYu0VNhNDZzW0EVBHJ9OUHIO+hOG1RMeK6IxgCWKPnWI2bH9Do4 Xh2/MZgCa9t5od/2H+qsxOvcoOSGSelzAHk9J40VM/+mcyCvfjn/my5w61NBTe51UyMmQS G31LAzAFkG3wrWyfSLayccV4sNcoWi7ZrINnlR4lLNxDgaR70bHRpAE09rMxmSz5iyDKe3 E7rLl8/aF+bZ3XalyccBhCwDN7SSReEP0pyEmUlsMvzwA10qqNqcjMnZDFYlpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=umich.edu header.s=relay-2018-08-29 header.b=GSmZDpqZ; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.08 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=umich.edu header.s=relay-2018-08-29 header.b=GSmZDpqZ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=umich.edu; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3C538A45F X-Spam-Score: -5.08 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: m078wNivFyA/ Timothy, > Just a quick note (see my long recent reply to Tim where I expand on this= more), > but this isn=E2=80=99t new behaviour (isn=E2=80=99t actually affected by = my recent changes) and > my concerns are with the viability of the necessary changes rather than w= hether > this would be good (we are of the same mind I think). yes, i see. i hadn't realized that. maybe, though, we could start off by warning people who are writing integer values; then deprecate it; then, N-releases from now, make it illegal? such a path might be worth it. or, at least the warnings -- irrespective, i would say, of whether or not the decimal value turns into some "reasonable" file mode value. cheers, Greg