From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Davis Subject: Re: Blank page in LaTeX/PDF output Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 07:27:54 -0500 Message-ID: <1393936074.5934.90371709.028FE30D@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <5311361B.10400@pfdstudio.com> <53113848.2060406@pfdstudio.com> <87wqgefvad.fsf@gmail.com> <5311566D.7030209@pfdstudio.com> <87sir2f5lr.fsf@gmail.com> <5311F34A.7060400@pfdstudio.com> <1393894268.17809.90193409.374029FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20140304011313.GA7830@pfdstudio-air.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52783) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKog2-0002GO-1y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 07:42:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKofx-0003kc-V2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 07:42:29 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:44979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKoRv-0007UQ-D1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 07:27:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Hendy On Mon, Mar 3, 2014, at 10:46 PM, John Hendy wrote: [snip] > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Peter Davis wrote: > From my fiddling: > - As-is produces 4 pages, blank 3rd > - Commenting out the hyperref package does *not* produce a blank 3rd page > - Using \section* does *not* product a blank 3rd page Thanks, John. It certainly seems that hyperref is at least partially to blame here. I'll have to check on what the developers consider a 3rd party package. hyperref itself loads a bunch of other packages, so it gets very complicated. > I added a comment linking to Wikipedia's Linux penguin that I used as > ./image.png, just to make sure it wasn't possibly related to errors > related to no image being found. I first saw the problem when I was using actual images, so I knew it wasn't that. > I wondered if it had something to do with the numbered sections being > treated as links (since hyperref was the culprit package). I fiddled > with removing \label{sec-n}, but that didn't have an effect. I > wondered if that was triggering something due to it having links sort > of "ready" for the TOC even though none is present... no idea! Seems plausible. > Anyway, as long as graphicx and hyperref are not considered "3rd > party," I think you could still submit the report. You may be told > that since there are overfull hbox and vbox's that it's not their > problem, but I'd still expect the results to be the same with \section > vs. \section*, and with[out] hyperref. Thanks again, John. I'll look into this and report back whatever I find. Best, -pd -- Peter Davis www.techcurmudgeon.com www.timebums.com