From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Soapy Smith <soapy-smith@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Namespace problem org-mode / Clojure
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 21:35:44 -0500
Message-ID: <1393900544.2011.4.camel@raven-CM5571>
References: <CACCk52LBYWSFeSpacdpCBT4yAZS8HTHzaAongGGV=0gcgbHciw@mail.gmail.com>
	<874n3fcuid.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47601)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <soapy-smith@comcast.net>) id 1WKfDH-000405-QT
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 21:36:21 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <soapy-smith@comcast.net>) id 1WKfD6-0005cz-Al
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 21:36:11 -0500
Received: from qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net
	([2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:64]:52899)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <soapy-smith@comcast.net>) id 1WKfD6-0005cZ-4d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 21:36:00 -0500
In-Reply-To: <874n3fcuid.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Volker Strobel <volker.strobel87@gmail.com>

Hi Bastien-

I will check it tomorrow and report.  Thank you!

Regarding TODOs related to Clojure code blocks; where is the best place
for them?

Greg


On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 13:54 +0100, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Volker and Greg,
> 
> I hopefully fixed this in master.
> 
> Can you pull and test?
> 
> Thanks,
>