From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Soapy Smith Subject: Re: Namespace problem org-mode / Clojure Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:20:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1393327200.2034.5.camel@raven-CM5571> References: <1393170060.2128.14.camel@raven-CM5571> <87vbw3v96a.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44283) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIG3h-0005Uq-Fv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:20:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIG3Y-0007si-2V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:20:21 -0500 Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:24]:50715) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIG3X-0007sX-TR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:20:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87vbw3v96a.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Volker Strobel Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I will add this issue to the list of TODOs for Clojure code blocks. One thing I can do quickly is see if the problem exists in version 7.9 org with nrepl (prior to CIDER). I have a machine which still has the old configuration. I will try later today and report. Regards, Greg (alias Soapy Smith) On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:22 +0100, Volker Strobel wrote: > Hi Soapy, > > thank you! I feel at ease knowing that you could replicate > the behavior, as I was trying to find the error in my settings for a > long, long time (and as mentioned before, it did work for some time, and > I've no clue why - I've played around with some settings in the init file). > > And yes, adding an explicit namespace declaration (ns, in-ns) to every code > block works, but that's a rather roundabout way (I've many small > snippets in the same namespace) and it produces a bit 'unsightly', > tangled code. So, I'd be really glad, if this issue could be processed. > > Best, Volker